Quotes from Ludwig Wittgenstein (The book, Tractatus Essay

Quotes from Ludwig Wittgenstein (The book, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus) - Essay Example in determining meaning arrives through the process of determination of whether an elementary proposition can be considered true or false depending on how it relates to the perceived reality of the world that is accepted as real by the multitudes. Language can therefore be said to consist entirely of propositions all of which can be analyzed for the purpose of breaking them down into elementary propositions. In turn, elementary propositions are actually simply name combinations used to refer to objects. On the metaphysical level, elementary propositions can also be termed logical representations of atomic facts. It is at the level of atomic facts that metaphysical language becomes particularly confusing because atomic facts are combination of complex facts that represent truth in the world (3.261) If language is a series of elemental propositions representing logical representations of atomic facts, then the obvious answer to the question of metaphysical meaning lies in the realization that any meaning of a particular word must be divorced from the thing it is intended to represent and instead pulled forth from this distortion of meaning so that it is applied instead to how the word is utilized. The meaning of language essentially becomes intertwined with context constructed from the elementary proposition. If elementary propositions are intended as a logical representation of an atomic fact then it becomes true that facts can change through context. As an example, consider the blue heron in scenario one. The blue heron can be broken down into several elementary propositions and the one the participant chooses to use in the scenario becomes a logical representation of the atomic fact that represents only the truth that some people do seen signs and make connection. Essentially this entire scenario can be read as a language game in which words like â€Å"sign† â€Å"soul† and â€Å"being† are all capable of being used with a broad amount of variability. Due the

I will proved topic tomorrow Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

I will proved topic tomorrow - Essay Example Hobbes on the other hand, assumed that people are the same with regard to their mental and physical characteristics and that one is responsible for controlling personal behavior. In addition, he said that people differ in both physical and mental capability. For instance, another through mental skills can overpower an individual with physical strength. Therefore, people are guided by societal norms and guidance to be behaved morally upright. However, the two thinkers cannot be considered moral egoists. For instance, the meaning of pleasure contradicts with the definition of Epicurus. â€Å"Pleasure is every person’s first and kindred good, it is the starting point of every choice and of every aversion† the statement means that searching for pleasure and living a pleasant life occurs naturally. Every individual has a right to live a pleasant life. Therefore, the behavior of a person should be controlled and should not only fulfill personal pleasures but also respect other people happiness (Shaw & Barry, 2004, 18). Epicurus does not however receive entire judgment as being a free thinker that is not egoistic. It is important to understand the fact that many books have termed him egoistic and many contemporary philosophers. The fact that he states that all actions are ethical does not offer him full credit as being liberal. If people acted out of their own interests without caring about the fate of others, the world would not be a so comfortable place. This would lead to a world full of selfish acts where people consequently carry out their actions just to please one. For example, a person who takes up an activity knowing very well that the result would harm the neighbor or someone else and still carries on with it shows moral egoism. According to Epicurus, the state in which the human mind operates does not always allow him to have moral justification in the carrying out of several acts. It is basic ethics to understand that